The debate around synthetic turf has intensified, especially with increasing concerns about environmental impact and player safety. Many critics are quick to label synthetic turf as the "villain," pointing to heat retention, microplastic pollution, and injury risk as major downsides. However, as our CEO Jarrod Hill highlights, the issue isn't so black and white. In a recent SBS article, Jarrod defended synthetic turf, emphasizing that while it's not without its challenges, it plays an important role in modern urban environments.

So, is synthetic turf truly the villain? Or are we simply misunderstanding its place and purpose in the evolving world of sports?

The Shift Away from Rubber Infill

One of the most contentious aspects of synthetic turf has been the use of rubber infill, which is often made from recycled tires. Concerns about microplastics leaching into the environment and potential health risks have made this a hot topic. SPORTENG acknowledges these concerns and reveals that the industry is already taking steps to move away from rubber infill in favour of more sustainable alternatives, such as cork.

As Jarrod notes, “In the next 12 to 18 months, we won’t see any more rubber infill fields being delivered.” This shift to organic infill like cork is designed to reduce environmental and health risks while still providing the performance and durability synthetic turf is known for.

Environmental Concerns: Weighing the Costs and Benefits

Synthetic turf critics are quick to highlight the environmental impact, particularly when it comes to heat retention and waste from worn-out fields. While these are valid points, SPORTENG stresses that synthetic turf is often misunderstood in the broader context of urban planning and community needs.

"Are synthetic turfs the demons? I think it's just misunderstood,” says Jarrod. His point is clear: synthetic turf is not perfect, but it serves a necessary function in areas where natural turf struggles to keep up with demand.

In Australia, where population density in urban centres is increasing, the need for durable, low-maintenance sports surfaces is crucial. While natural turf is preferable in many cases, the reality is that communities are densifying, and maintaining natural grass in high-traffic areas is often impractical. Synthetic turf, with its lower maintenance requirements and year-round usability, offers a viable solution where natural grass would otherwise fail.

Maintenance of a synthetic turf Field of Play

A Balanced Approach to Field Design

At SPORTENG, the goal is not to replace natural turf entirely but to find the right balance. Jarrod’s preference remains clear: “I’d hate to see a place where all sports grounds are synthetic, and my preference is always natural turf.” However, he also recognises the practical need for synthetic turf in certain contexts, particularly in highly urbanised areas where space is limited, and the demands on sports fields are high.

As communities grow, the pressure on sports facilities increases, and synthetic turf provides a surface that can withstand heavy use without requiring extensive maintenance or recovery time. It offers a practical solution for meeting the recreational needs of urban populations while reducing water use and maintenance costs.

The Future of Synthetic Turf

The narrative around synthetic turf is evolving, and SPORTENG is at the forefront of advocating for a more nuanced discussion. Yes, there are environmental concerns, and yes, synthetic turf is not a perfect solution. But as Jarrod rightly points out, synthetic turf is far from being the villain in this conversation. Instead, it’s a misunderstood technology that, when used appropriately, can benefit both communities and the environment.

With the industry moving towards more sustainable options like organic infill and with continued advancements in synthetic turf technology, the future looks promising. The challenge is to use these materials in the right contexts and to continue innovating so that synthetic turf can coexist with natural turf to meet the diverse needs of modern sports facilities.

Westend Griffith multi-use sports facility with synthetic turf Field of Play - Photo credit Hines Construction

It's Not About Choosing Sides

The key takeaway from SPORTENG’s perspective is that the debate over synthetic turf isn’t about choosing sides. It’s about understanding the benefits and drawbacks of both synthetic and natural surfaces and making informed decisions based on the specific needs of each community.

As we move towards more sustainable solutions and away from rubber infill, synthetic turf will continue to play a vital role in urban sports field design. The key is to balance innovation with environmental stewardship—something SPORTENG is committed to achieving.

Curious about the environmental impact of synthetic turf? Download our comprehensive Microplastic Displacement Playbook to explore how innovations like organic infill are helping reduce microplastic pollution and making synthetic surfaces more sustainable for the future.